In my 2013 CU1 setup my users sometimes gets "Remote Server returned '532 5.3.2 STOREDRV.Deliver; Missing or bad StoreDriver MDB properties'" when sending to a shared mailbox.
I have "AddressBookPolicyRoutingEnabled : False" and the mailbox is not hidden.
Any tips on where to look?
Hi,
we upgraded from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013.
Our old 2007 Frontend still acts as a SMTP Relay to forward emails from legacy devices (storages, printers etc) to our new Setup.
Everything works fine except emails that are having an unroutable Mail From: address (ie. user@machine), no FQDN.
They are forwarded fine to the new setup, but i believe EXC2013 does not accept emails like this.
Unfortunately this sender address is hardcoded and can not be changed easily at this point. Is there any solution to this?
Thanks a lot
Sascha
Hi,
I am tasked with deploying Exchange 2010 SP1 on the premises in order to move our mail services on site. I've followed the instructions of deployment assistant, which enabled me to successfully deploy the server and its services.
My issue now though is that, because the on premises and the hosted service utilizes the same Login IDs, Outlook will constantly prompt my users for the local password, though their intention is to sign into the hosted service mailbox as we have not yet cut over.
I've tried setting the MX record priority on the local DNS server, however this only ensures that outbound mails are routed using the hosted service but does not prevent Outlook from trying to connect to the local mail server with the same UPN.
I need to be able to test the deployment with the our domain name (ex. john.doe@acme.com) without interfering with the production environment even if they use the same Login ID.
I know I can set up an alternate domain suffix (actually I've already done this) and test everything, however my manager is pretty peculiar and likes to test things apples-2-apples.
Any advise you can provide would be fine.
Quen
Hi,
We have 5 CAS 2010 behind the load balancer. Everything works fine. SOmetime we are getting event ID 7011 in system logs with below description on any of the one of CAS server and user's outlook 2010 get disconnect.
"A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the MSExchangeAB service."
"A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the MSExchangeRPC service."
We have statically configured end point mapper port 8000 & 8001
What are the factors which affecting this issue?
Is this issue related to Exchange 2010 SP3 or Windows 2008 R2?
Thanks
jitender
We are a school district and need to prevent to our students from being able to receive email from outside our district.
IE, no internet mail.
I am already aware of the "users must be authenticated" trick but I know there is a better way to do it. We set it up for our Exchange 2010 server years ago but I can't remember how. Our students now do not have the "users must be authenticated" checkbox checked, and do not receive external email so I know it can be done another way.
If I remember right we might have done it in Exchange 2010 with the anti-malware somehow?
In my Outlook 2007 there is nothing in my Outbox. But when i right click on my name/email address in my OL2007 > click data file properties > Folder Size tab on the bottom right here it shows 300mb worth of email is stuck in the outbox. how do i delete this, tried creating a new outlook profile.
thanks in adv
I'm using Exchange 2013, I using Yahoo! mail and Gmail as smart host. If I enable the "Proxy through client access server" on my send connector, I will receive 530 authentication error.
smtp114.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Remote Server returned '530 authentication required
mx.google.com Remote Server returned '530-5.5.1 Authentication Required. Learn more at 530 5.5.1
If I disable "Proxy through client access server", the mail can be sent from mailbox role server. is there anythings wrong with my config?
Thanks.
P.S.% I use Basic authentication for smart host authentication.If all I want to do is authenticate to exchange and be able to send and receive email from an Outlook client on a secure VLAN. What ports do I need to request to be opened on the Firewall between my secure VLAN and the open VLAN? Including sending and receiving over SSL.
Thanks!
Hello,
If my ISP is Verizon.net and my hosting company for our domain is Arvixe, when I fill the field for Account in the Outbound Security of the SmallBusiness SMTP Connector properties that are here:
Do I use the account from my Verizon.net ISP or do I use the account from Arvixe email?
Any help would be gratefully appreciated.
Thanks,
Tony
Stop The World, I want To Get Off! ........... Life Isn't About Waiting For The Storm To Pass ... It's About Learning To Dance In The Rain.
I have an issue trying to encrypt an email message and sending it to someone. The error which i'm facing is "Microsoft outlook cannot sign or encrypt this message because the certificate is not valid". I've never used this SMIME feature of outlook. Referred few articles and blogs but couldn't get any clue. I've managed to get the user certificate for myself from Comodo which is for free use. Please let me know how to understand and use this feature as i'm new to it. Does the server has to do anything in this process related to SMIME settings..
Hi all. I have an exchange server that has been up and runing now for 90 days no problems. We have not done anything to change anything on the server at all. I have installed SBS 2011 witch has exchange server 2010 as you all know. ok here is the problem. all the suden the emails were being rejected for inbound. And it is hit and miss. you can send an out side email fromme@hotmail.com once, maybe twice and you might get a address rejected. I have ran all updates, Disable the fire wall, ran best pratic, MX recoreds are right, I have even delted MX recoreds and remade them. I get no other errors and like I have said it is hit and miss. some times they come threw other times it wont. any thoughts on what I shouls look at?
Reporting-MTA: dns;bay0-omc2-s18.bay0.hotmail.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;BAY403-EAS424
Arrival-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:14:53 -0700
Final-Recipient: rfc822;me@dormain.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
Dave Orn. IT/ Manager ProPac Labs
If we deploy Exchange 2013 in co-exist envt with Exch 2007 and have to shut down Exch 2013 for some maintenance / update, does Ex-2007 takes care of the mail flow for the users who are still on Ex-2007 and not migrated over to Ex-2013?
I know there won't be any issue for outgoing email. I am not sure for incoming emails. Any suggestion?
Thanks.
Dear
We have 2 x Exchange 2003 (FE & BE), during Exchange 2003/2010 mail flow issue, we delete then recreate send connector (to Smart host->Internet) and the (Ex2k3/Ex2k10-HT) servers routing group connectors
After that all mail flow working fine (between 2k3 & 2k10/ and outside/inside). Only we start getting Event logs on FE and BE with the below details :
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSExchangeMTA
Event Category: Security
Event ID: 9297
Date: 6/4/2013
Time: 7:00:53 AM
User: N/A
Computer: BE
Description:
Calling client thread does not have permission to use MTA RPCs. Windows 2000 error code: 0X80070005. Client user account: NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON. [BASE IL INCOMING RPC 29 237] (14)
When I gave the Anonymous SendAs/ReceiveAs permission it stop EventID 9297 and log event 9322, so i revert back. We don't have name resolution issue or communication issue between BE/FE servers
I have a C# application that sends to distribution lists via the System.Net.Mail.SmtpClient class.
The distribution lists are pulled using an LDAP query, and I store both the outlook name for the distribution list as well as the actual email of the distribution list for use.
For example: I store both #TEST Users (name) and #testusers@mycompany.com (actual email address for the distribution list)
I've run several tests with multiple distribution lists without any problems. Emails send fine without any problems.
One of my distribution lists, however, #XYZApp Users, refuses to send to anyone. This distribution list has a total of 546 recipients. None of the other lists are that large, however, I did successfully send an email with two separate distribution lists that totalled 744 recipients (one list had 438 the other 306).
Any ideas why one distribution list would work and others would not? Is there a cap on the number of recipients in a distribution list when sending emails over SMTP?
I have been trying to setup TLS on exchange 2010 using a public certificate. but when I perform a TLS check I get an error because of the exchange self-signed certificate.
Please find result of the test below:
Checking hmtadmin@deloitte-mu.com
looking up MX hosts on domain "deloitte-mu.com"
Trying TLS on **********.deloitte-mu.com[196.192.8.61] (20):
| seconds | test stage and result | |
|---|---|---|
| [000.870] | Connected to server | |
| [001.157] | <-- | 220 <local hostname>.deloitte-mu.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:35:41 +0400 |
| [001.157] | We are allowed to connect | |
| [001.158] | --> | EHLO checktls.com |
| [001.454] | <-- | 250-<local hostname>.deloitte-mu.local
Hello [69.61.187.232] 250-SIZE 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-STARTTLS 250-X-ANONYMOUSTLS 250-AUTH NTLM 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM 250-8BITMIME 250-BINARYMIME 250-CHUNKING 250-XEXCH50 250-XRDST 250 XSHADOW |
| [001.454] | We can use this server | |
| [001.455] | TLS is an option on this server | |
| [001.455] | --> | STARTTLS |
| [001.748] | <-- | 220 2.0.0 SMTP server ready |
| [001.749] | STARTTLS command works on this server | |
| [002.366] | Cipher in use: AES128-SHA | |
| [002.366] | Connection converted to SSL | |
| [002.427] | Certificate 1 of 2 in chain: subject= /CN=<local hostname> issuer= /CN=<local hostname> | |
| [002.460] | Certificate 2 of 2 in chain: subject= /CN=<local hostname> issuer= /CN=<local hostname> | |
| [002.722] | Cert NOT VALIDATED: unable to get local issuer certificate | |
| [002.722] | this may help: What Is An Intermediate Certificate | |
| [002.724] | So email is encrypted but the domain is not verified | |
| [002.728] | Cert Hostname DOES NOT VERIFY (*********.deloitte-mu.com !=<local hostname>) | |
| [002.729] | So email is encrypted but the host is not verified | |
| [002.729] | ~~> | EHLO checktls.com |
| [003.028] | <~~ | 250-<local hostname>.deloitte-mu.local
Hello [69.61.187.232] 250-SIZE 250-PIPELINING 250-DSN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-AUTH NTLM LOGIN 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM 250-8BITMIME 250-BINARYMIME 250-CHUNKING 250-XEXCH50 250-XRDST 250 XSHADOW |
| [003.033] | TLS successfully started on this server | |
| [003.033] | ~~> | MAIL FROM: <test@checktls.com> |
| [003.327] | <~~ | 250 2.1.0 Sender OK |
| [003.337] | Sender is OK | |
| [003.337] | ~~> | RCPT TO: <hmtadmin@deloitte-mu.com> |
| [003.633] | <~~ | 250 2.1.5 Recipient OK |
| [003.634] | Recipient OK, E-mail address proofed | |
| [003.634] | ~~> | QUIT |
| [003.932] | <~~ | 221 2.0.0 Service closing transmission channel Can anyone help me on the issue above. Thanks. |
Greetings,
I have an Exchange server 2010 installed on my network and I am curious whether I can route my email traffic through my old Email Service Provider. i.e can I set up my Exchange server so all incoming and outgoing emails are routed through the Email Service Provider???
Thanks
This is the error message that I can see in my Exchange Queue,
My queue are reaching to 1000.
We have upgraded from 2007 to 2013 and we are planning on getting rid of our old list server to use Exchange's fancy new moderated distribution lists. To my dismay, it won't let you add smtp accounts, thus, I have to create an AD object for every member of our lists. The problem has come about giving access to users outside of our organization the ability to email the list.
If I set delivery management to the default, "Only members inside my organization" the following occurs: People in my organization are moderated, people outside get a NDR.
If I set delivery management to the other option, "Senders inside and outside my organization", the following occurs: People in my organization are moderated, people outside are not, and email goes through to the entire list.
How can I set this up so that inside and outside people get moderated. This seems poorly implemented, or maybe it is just not working properly.